Видео

arctic ground squirrels (AGS) have the ability to regenerate brain cells and synapses, or connections between brain cells, at remarkable speeds during and after hibernation.

You're great at putting things into perspective! I was able to follow your lecture with out feeling lost. I like how you put abstract concepts into perspecitve, allowing people to feel something familiar while unpacking your prospect.

Blessings 🙏

Danke 🤩 jetzt weiß ich’s! Perfekt

Great talk, but why the quality of the video even though at 1080 DPI is still so pixelated? What is so high-tech at Caltech to make it look so amateurish? I don't understand.

at 24:06 / Gravitational Memory (h+ geometry) inverse Pythagorean Theory = 2 to the ten exponentially or 1023 x PI or 360 degrees = 368,640 ways to perceive gravitational memory; each way unique. Each way more than '0' and less than '1' like the color of our universe.

I’m getting irritated with concepts of degrading sugars in daily meals from dieticians instructions ( not personal but fashion norms )… How does it get approved when carbs are yeh most digestive forms of while fats get their layered on …

2024 this guy was talking about the future

19:35 Provided vector v is tangent, vector a should be inwards

excellent work and presentation!

Fuck the universe and it's wack gifts. Aint shit.

“Machine Gun” Lou Butera!!

Isaac Newton’s Universal Gravity Equation F = G m M/ r2 solution in real numbers system or Time Independent Domain = Solution A = Particle Motion = Classical physics And r₀ = a (1 - ε2) / (1 + ε cosine θ) Isaac Newton’s Universal Gravity Equation F = G m M/ r2 solution in complex numbers system or Time dependent Domain = Solution B = Wave Motion = Wave Physics = Quantum physics And r = r₀ e i ω t = [a (1 - ε2) / (1 + ε cosine θ)] e i ω t Isaac Newton’s calculations of Urbain Le Verrier 1859 Mercury Precession Historical Observational Mistake of 43 arc second per century (1st proof of General Relativity) (θʹ x - θʹ₀) T in arc seconds per century = - 720 x 3600 x (36525.6 day/88 day) [√ (1- ε2)/ (1- ε) 2] sine2 ω t For planet Mercury T = 88 days; Elliptic eccentricity = ε = 0.256 And ω t = arc tan (v/c); v = 48x103 m/sec; c =3x108 m/sec = 43 Arc Seconds per Century

Earth speed = [2 π x c/86400]/sine (c/r) x (air index of refraction) ³ = 29.78 km/sec c = Sun’s radius = 299792458 meters, r = Earth’s equatorial radius = 6378137 meters, air index of refraction = 1.000293833

It was that fast. I thought it was just a strobe. I saw about 50 flashes.

Great to hear your ambitious thesis...and pragmatic one...how about making friends on our own planet earth...or within one's country without discreminating others based on ethnicity, religion and language etc. how wol those friends you refer to 3:07 will differ from us.. Best wishes on your career...

Superb!

God, Everyone dies. Can't we send information back in time to prevent a tragic death? Or can't we send a message to the future and ask them to tell you how to do it? / Please, Can anyone make it possible to sending messages to past? My father Kim Kyu Dong died SNU hospital at 2024.04.15. I must prevent that death. / Both light and electromagnetic waves are called waves. Is the wave going out from point A to point B? Or is it already at points A and B like the sea, but only the waves are transmitted? In modern science, it seems to be seen as the former... / What about time and space? In modern science, time and space are the latter, don't you think? / In other words, space-time comes first, and light, photons and protons go along that path... / So the Einsteinian school's absolute speed of light is strange? At the absolute speed of light, is not the speed determined by light, but by the time and space that already exists? Isn't speed the time to move from point A to point B? If time and space are not absolutely fixed, why does the speed of light have absolute speed? / Therefore, the absolute speed of light can also be wrong. Isn't the absolute speed of light a space-time dimensional barrier? If it exceeds the absolute speed, will it jump to another dimension? / Einstein's theory is based on the dimension only now, so if you go beyond this dimension, is not it beyond the constraints of Einstein? / The question is whether you can find an object faster than light or accelerate light. Or is space-time and massive mass spread out in front of us, and can not we cross the space-time dimension using space-time and massive mass? / In this sense, I think we should study whether there is a way to send signals to the past. We don't have to worry about who in the past will get this signal, do you? We're already receiving a 24-hour signal from radio telescopes and various receivers. / If we think deeper... Light has a slower speed as it passes through the medium. / It is not that we can not accelerate light, but is not the absolute speed of light the highest speed of light observed in our dimension? / Is not it observable only at a constant speed in the dimension we are in? / If we accelerated the light at all, for example, if we shot light on a spacecraft, or if the light of the sun already moving at a high speed exceeded the observable absolute speed, would not it have passed to another dimension? / Whether there are eleven dimensions, or even larger dimensions, is not there necessarily a overlap with our dimension in the end? / Would not light or radio waves that went to another dimension come back to our dimension as slow as passing through the medium? / Can't we do an experiment like this? / Why don't we measure the amount of electromagnetic energy by accelerating it with magnetic force? Or how about measuring the amount of light coming out of the sun to accelerate to the mass of Mercury or Venus?

Just as with a Hieronymus Bosch painting which is nothing if you look too closely at a single painting but if you look at the painting from a far distance or better yet look at many different Bosch paintings you'll find interesting patterns .... similar to that .... view the series of videos of which this is one and again look for patterns not in a particular set of words but in the aggregate of the series of videos

What is forgotten is you have gravity inside matter and outside . Gravity from the space of the universe and gravity from space within matter that holds matter together.

Izinkan saya meng share video anda ... :)

The guy who asked about Terrence should’ve ashamed of him self…

So, y'all have been listening...🤔/⚫️

Waves of what? upon what ? by what ?

FASCINATING. And outstanding work, too - very nice.

If in a hole in ground materials that keep heat it and dont let it out , could heat water or air to spin a turbine and produce energy

Couldn't it be argued that the deeper reality is just a sum of all its possible physical appearances?

In light of the Law of Inertia, rest must be only a relative term, or else it has no real meaning. This would appear to solve Zeno's Paradox of the Arrow. Zeno contended that an arrow in flight must always be at rest because at each point of its flight the arrow is simply where it is -- occupying a space equal to its length for that duration. Since this is supposedly what we mean by 'at rest', the arrow in flight must paradoxically always be at rest. But the Law of Inertia tells us that nothing is absolutely at rest, that everything is always in motion. So, even when the arrow has fallen and lays on the ground it is still in motion, only now its motion is that of the rotation of the earth. In other words, the arrow laying on the ground is 'at rest' only relative to the rotation of the earth, being neither faster nor slower than that rotation for the duration it lays on the ground. But when it was in flight, it was moving slightly faster than the rotation as it moved through the air. Therefore, it is not 'at rest' during each point of its flight, as Zeno falsely concluded, because, as we can now realize from the Law of Inertia, being 'at rest' simply means moving at the same speed as the surface of the earth, and the arrow in flight is actually moving slightly faster.

It's been an amazing performance and and wonderful presentation

Awesome lecture. I learned a lot! Cool names for all these genes!

Professor Stone, what a rich and positive life you had. I would've been happy if I'd accomplished any one of your achievements. RIP, Sir.

16:30 what if there is an underlying hidden principle that pre-determines what alice could possibly see? wouldn't such a theoretically possible principle (assuming our knowledge of the world is not complete) first have to be ruled out before drawing the conclusions? but i don't know how you would rule out something that cannot be measured or seen. hard to prove the non-existence of unknown things.

I’m not convinced to be honest. Every time I listen to presentations like this I just get presented with anecdotal evidence which means nothing really and certainly can’t be qualified as scientific. I had what’s called a NDE myself but caused through overwork and little sleep. Had the same experiences listed multiple times but I see it for what it is. A biological reaction to physical trauma. Nothing more, nothing less.

Magical-functional Nomenclatures do tend to det stuck in the kind of cultural memory associations of the circumstances in which they are discovered, and it's only by the teaching-learning process that continuous modification of the modulation-magic mechanism of relative-timing sync-duration reference-framing that progress is advanced in logical stages. Simple, not at all easy, but Researchers with more than one communication language have an advantage, wether they know that specifically or not.

Excellent Teaching presentation of the bio-logical flash-fractal In-form-ation characteristics of sync-duration sequences and mostly, the naming of component abstractions by their magical-functional micro analogous behavior in the macro perspectives.

Very promising if you can tell which patient will benefit from in ex. heart medications, and who will develope severe sideeffect, leading to urgent hospitalization and even death. To prolong my life span, I had 7 different medications in max. dosis, after a benign stent op, and during the next 10 weeks, I was hospitalised 6 times, with severe lifethreathening conditions attacking other organs than the heart, before doctors had to take away the betablockers, ACE inhibitors, blodthinners, diuretics and statins. That would be nice to know in advance.

blah blah blah. This video begins at 15:00

How much of ligo tech has gone into UFO detection.

There is a brilliance at work here, no question. I grasp how he goes step by step. I think the pitfall, if there is one, is that the shortcuts (algorithms) may not accurately illuminate correctly one or more of the steps. The concept of permanent change due to the gravity waves is fascinating. It seems to me that everything, then, generates gravity waves, even bouncing a ball on the ground should generate gravity waves. If there was equipment sensitive enough to register even the smallest gravity waves, would these gravity waves cancel out other gravity waves, even down to the quantum level? That means that there would be memories leftover. It seems to me that this will greatly complicate the search for a way to describe Quantum Gravity, should it even exist.

Gravitational quanta (in digital format) measure the Universe?! Кванты гравитации (цифровым способом) измеряют Вселенную?! Для сравнения: Подобных теории как ОТО. Эйнштейна написано 1001, из них, опубликованы только в популярных журналах более 150. Но за 150 лет, не одного прямого опыта для этих теорий (выполненные на 50%, есть опыт или косвенные). Вы готовы посмотреть на обнаженную Вселенную без шумового *загрязнения* для 1001 теории? При детектирование гравитационных волн, детектором LIGO, полезный сигнал 0,2% на шум приходится 99,8%. По другому выразим - используя сепаратор из шаблонов. При случайном совпадают в них шумов (мусор), на двух или трёх детекторах, то выдадут это, как гравитационные волны. На “ГИБРИД оптическом гироскопе" при регистрации, квантов гравитации *оптом*. Возможно полезные сигнал получим 74% и на шумы 26%. - Вам выбирать рулетку, что измеряет Вселенную и из чего, главное она состоит. Итак автотранспорт или самолёт в нём выполним опыты Майкельсона-Морли, определяя им прямолинейную скорость. - О таком опыте мечтал, Эйнштейн. Но мы, *возможно* будем наблюдать постулаты "Свет это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов. Доминантные гравитационные поля управляют скоростью света в вакууме". Есть предложение на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 250000 метров при этом, не превышает параметры 87/87/87 см., и вес - 24кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно-оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы, для учебно практического применения в школах и для ВУЗ. Рационализатор из Казахстана.

this entire presentation brought to you by a single word; namely...

it was indeed a touching video and I loved that you could actually feel how passionate these people are about what they do.

Excellent presentation!

The event horizon of black hole is the place where all our souls located and our body is inside the black hole our physical reality here is a projection or the shadow of whats going on on the boundry of the univese and all our behavior as souls are memorized so its all about memory ans information its a virtual reality and the player is the soul

Its all about memory and information ..

Quantum mechanics is right. Einstein is wrong.

I like Caltech now.

clear

05:55 derivatives begins